Cocaine is commonly recognized as the baseline for degradation cliches in the U.S.. A product, pastime or vice has made it big when an authority figure compares its addictive power to that of cocaine while warning the public of a looming threat to domestic tranquility.
Once a reporter is told something is “as addictive as cocaine,” the story practically writes itself. And if the reporter happens to be hooked on cocaine, too, it’s finished in no time.
Our latest addiction cliche comes courtesy of Republican state senator Todd Weiler who has in-troduced a resolution that would require Utah to recognize porn as a “public health hazard” and take steps to prevent its spread.
The senator gets points for concern, but this will be like preventing the spread of humidity.
Weiler contends an addiction to pornography “is more difficult to overcome than cocaine.” It’s cer-tainly cheaper. Once the victim is past the fixed costs of a broadband connection and a viewing technology the product is essentially free. At least that’s the case in Utah where, although porn viewing is pervasive, the average time online is the second shortest in the nation.
The trailers and teasers appear to satisfy, so to speak.
The senator does recognize there is the potential for government overreach, so he plans to take a hands–off approach with regard to masturbation. Weiler told the NY Daily News, “My resolution does not deal with [self–abuse], I think that’s beyond the scope of what I’m doing.”
Pornography now joins the long and surprisingly diverse list of “more addictive thans.”
Time magazine found a Connecticut College study that claims Oreos are as addictive as crack cocaine to lab rats. And the findings are certainly applicable to humans since the rats eat the creamy center first, too.
The L.A. Weekly contends you can’t go to the grocery store without falling into the clutches of demon food, because “food can actually be considered more addictive than crack.” This warning is based on research indicating two–thirds of Americans “have significant difficulties controlling their food intake.”
A phenomena you can witness yourself during chocolate buffet night on any cruise ship.
This warning does have a motivational bright side. Now dieters can feel as heroic as Robert Downey, Jr., since they can describe hunger pangs as withdrawal symptoms.
The Daily Mail says being in front of a computer can still be a problem even if you keep your hands to yourself. Swedish researcher Sven Rollenhagen warns the online World of Warcraft has been part of every case of game addiction he’s treated. Yes, “It is the crack cocaine of the com-puter game world. Some will play it till they drop.”
It’s obvious why the warning industry has so much invested in the “addictive as cocaine” cliche. If cocaine were found to be no more dangerous than powdered sugar, Oreos would vanish from the shelves overnight and Chicken Littles would be verbally disarmed.
That resistance is why the National Survey on Drug Use has trouble getting traction. It found 80 percent of those surveyed who had tried crack — supposedly even worse than cocaine — had not used it in the past year. What’s more, the initial experience appears to have been beneficial to society as a whole. The blow testers also report paying their taxes on time, stopping before turn-ing right on red and never parking in handicapped spaces.
Cocaine effectiveness is also under attack on the chemical side. Some claim Fentanyl — which sounds like something you drink on a date with Bill Cosby — is now the most addictive drug, but I don’t see that cliche catching on. It’s too hard to spell and too hard to pronounce.
The bottom line for me always returns to the messenger: Wouldn’t the expert have had to be ad-dicted to cocaine at some point to be able to accurately compare dependency power? And if so, does America want to take advice from a bunch of former crack heads?
Michael Shannon is a commentator and public relations consultant, and is the author of “A Con-servative Christian’s Guidebook for Living in Secular Times.” He can be reached at email@example.com.